5 Comments
User's avatar
David Holzman's avatar

There is definitely such a thing as a penis being too big to fit into a vagina, or a vagina being too small for a penis to fit. And when the latter has been in many of the former, but one was too small, well, the drift should be obvious.

Lynn W Gardner's avatar

Robert, a member of Jacks ACF stack recommend this video, I believe given todays topic you need to find a β€œnice” girl to spend time with so I am sending your way as a public service 😊😊😊

https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnewsvideo/comments/mxcuu2/asking_her_mennonite_sisters_pop_culture_questions/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

David Florida's avatar

Vonnegut's Kilgore Trout seems relevant here, but likely forgotten!

Robert Farago's avatar

I’m a big Vonnegut fan having read all his books but I don’t see the connection between this post and Mr. Trout. Care to elucidate?

David Florida's avatar

IIRC, it was likely a response to the popular embrace of John Holmes and his reputed endowment. Perhaps Breakfast of Champions? It was at least 35 years ago, so mileage may vary.

In any case, there was a mention of Trout’s member and it was described as one and a half inches long but four and a half inches in diameter, this being far more pleasing to women given that the length of the average birth canal was inadequate to accommodate a twelve inch penis. Vonnegut was an original.